Regional trade-offs from multi-species maximum sustainable yield (MMSY) management options

نویسندگان

  • Rudi Voss
  • Martin F. Quaas
  • Jörn O. Schmidt
  • Julia Hoffmann
چکیده

The maximum sustainable yield (MSY) is, theoretically, the largest yield that can be taken from a single species’ stock over an indefinite period. Formulation of strategic MSY management goals is, however, complicated by the need to move beyond biological single-species considerations. Interactions among species necessitate multispecies (MMSY) definitions, incorporating ecological, economic and social considerations. We developed an ecological− economic model of the Baltic Sea, simulating stock dynamics of interacting populations of cod Gadus morhua, herring Clupea harengus and sprat Sprattus sprattus. We investigated a set of different strategic management options. These likely, yet non-formalized experiments evaluate and illuminate alternative regional trade-offs. We computed multi-species maximum economic yield (MMEY) under certain eco logical constraints, with profits as a performance indicator. An unconstrained profit-maximizing management strategy would lead to a highly profitable cod fishery in a cod-dominated ecosystem. Concurrent sprat stock size (and profits) would be low, falling below ecological precautionary reference points. Consideration of ecological constraints on minimum stock sizes leaves a range of strategies, including the change from a cod-dominated to a more clupeiddominated system. The regional distribution of profits depends on the management. Therefore, adjustment payments or other forms of compensation might be needed to achieve a concordant agreement on strategic multi-species management goals.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Maximum sustainable yield from interacting fish stocks in an uncertain world: two policy choices and underlying trade-offs

The case of fisheries management illustrates how the inherent structural instability of ecosystems can have deep-running policy implications. We contrast ten types of management plans to achieve maximum sustainable yields (MSY) from multiple stocks and compare their effectiveness based on a management strategy evaluation (MSE) that uses complex food webs in its operating model. Plans that prima...

متن کامل

Critical thresholds and tangible targets for ecosystem-based management of coral reef fisheries.

Sustainably managing ecosystems is challenging, especially for complex systems such as coral reefs. This study develops critical reference points for sustainable management by using a large empirical dataset on the coral reefs of the western Indian Ocean to investigate associations between levels of target fish biomass (as an indicator of fishing intensity) and eight metrics of ecosystem state....

متن کامل

Assessing Social – Ecological Trade-Offs to Advance Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management

Modern resource management faces trade-offs in the provision of various ecosystem goods and services to humanity. For fisheries management to develop into an ecosystem-based approach, the goal is not only to maximize economic profits, but to consider equally important conservation and social equity goals. We introduce such a triple-bottom line approach to the management of multi-species fisheri...

متن کامل

Sustainable exploitation of temperate fish stocks.

The theory of maximum sustainable yield (MSY) underpins many fishery management regimes and is applied principally as a single species concept. Using a simple dynamic biomass production model we show that MSY can be identified from a long time series of multi-stock data at a regional scale in the presence of species interactions and environmental change. It suggests that MSY is robust and calcu...

متن کامل

Ethical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage

This article discusses what ethicists have called “unacceptable trade-offs” in health policy choices related to universal health coverage (UHC). Since the fiscal space is constrained, trade-offs need to be made. But some trade-offs are unacceptable on the path to universal coverage. Unacceptable choices include, among other examples from low-income countries, to expand coverage for services wit...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014